Symbolic Logic

In the Chapter on ?Propositions of Existence? I have adopted a new ?normal form,? in which the Class, whose existence is affirmed or denied, is regarded as the Predicate, instead of the Subject, of the Proposition, thus evading a very subtle difficulty which besets the other form.

These subtle difficulties seem to lie at the root of every Tree of Knowledge, and they are far more hopeless to grapple with than any that occur in its higher branches. For example, the difficulties of the Forty-Seventh Proposition of Euclid are mere child?s play compared with the mental torture endured in the effort to think out the essential nature of a straight Line. And, in the present work, the difficulties of the ?5 Liars?? compared with the bewildering question ?What is a Thing??

In the Chapter on ?Propositions of Relation? I have inserted a new Section, containing the proof that a Proposition, beginning with ?All,? is a Double Proposition (a fact that is quite independent of the arbitrary rule, laid down in the next Section, that such a Proposition is to be understood as implying the actual existence of its Subject).